"Can Wilderness be Found on the Wilderness Trail" pages 157-161 (Spencer Mottley)
In the beginning of the article "Can Wilderness be Found on the Wilderness Trail" by Dr Ridick. He
explains how early outdoorsmen like Thoreau saw the western wilderness as a place of renewal,
transformation and freedom, viewing the opportunity to travel west as a type of religious/spiritual
endeavor. With Thoreau even going as far as referring to the West as a holy land. Although this
Exploration has clear benefits for the human psyche, the implications on nature, as seen in the
Westward Expansion Period can be very negative if our journeys into the wilderness are not conducted in
a conucous manner. One way Americans have conserved the landscapes they cherish is through
advocating for and creating national parks and scenic trails. Another way Americans have conserved
The landscapes they cherish is through passing the Wilderness Act of 1946, the objective of this act is to
create a legal definition for the word wilderness in the United States, which defines the wilderness as a
place where a man is not a resident but is only a visitor. Although this act was created to create a legal
framework for protecting natural landscapes. It doesn't come without some considerations and potential
criticisms, one of which is that the act of even imposing a definition on wilderness is, in a way, taming the
landscape. "Defining wilderness, therefore, erases the very thing we attempt to understand (Dr Ridick)."
Another consideration regarding the Wilderness Act is the question of whether the wilderness even exists
Anymore in an era in which we've mapped and explored every corner of the earth? My answer to this
question would be no thinking of wilderness in its pure state. Although, still to this day, natural landscapes
like natural parks are much wilder/ closer to being wilderness than the landscapes we've cultivated or built
over.
Comments
Post a Comment