The Ecology of Eden Chapter 28 (pages 379 - 384) (Spencer Mottley)
Chapter 28 of "The Ecology of Eden" titled "Reclaiming Arcadia" begains by makeing usefull
distinction between planet fetishers and planet managers. The althour describes planet fetishers as those
who belive true sustainability consist of humans abandoning our moderen way of life and returening to
live the way we did thousands of years ago. Planet managers/decouplers on the other hand are
described as being those who belive true sustainability consist of humans fully investing in our
techological capabilites and abandoning our rural, suburban and sustenance lifestyles in favor of liveing in
hypermodern and efficient cities. While the author notes that the managers/decouplers vision of
sustainablity is more accurate and realistic than the fetishers vision. The decouplers vision comes with
some crucial drawbacks as well, these include the elimination of agrarian culture, survival skills and of the
middlelands in general. The destruction of the later would lead to a reduction of choice for those interested
in liveing inbetween the wilderness and the city. While the althour is in favor of there being a wide array
of different developmental landscapes for pepole to live. He argues that regardless of where one chooses
to live there are unquie responsableties that should be abided by. For instance in the rural middle
landscapes supporting local farmers is a responsiblity, due to the fact that farmers keep the landscape a
working one. Which is a big part of what makes the cultivated countryside so charming to many. The next
section "Unsprawling The Suburb" discusses how the addition of the car has changed the layout of the
suburb from a walkable and closely nit small town to a spraling collection of subdivisions. That leaves us
isolated from each other and dependent on cars. The althour expains that we can return to a better sense of
community within our suburbs by utilizeing empty space and turning it into parks, town centers, senoir
liveing communites etc. After reading this article I was left with a question and an answer to that question.
My question is, is it actually possible to reclaim arcadia or at least save what truely remains of it? For this
question I would say it is possible through presistant public pressure, public lobbying and enacting strict
zoneing laws that prohibit big corporations and subdivisions from expanding into certain small towns and
agricultural areas. In my option one of the main challenges that arises with saveing arcadia is combateing
pressure from greedy corporations. Who often have alot of resources, lobbyist and connections that make
it relitively easy for them to get their way.
Comments
Post a Comment